HomeSectionsSection 153: Exclusion of...

Section 153: Exclusion of evidence to contradict answers to questions testing veracity

When a witness has been asked and has answered any question which is relevant to the inquiry only in so far as it tends to shake his credit by injuring his character, no evidence shall be given to contradict him; but, if he answers falsely, he may after wards be charged with giving false evidence.

Exception 1.– If a witness is asked whether he has been previously convicted of any crime and denies it, evidence may be given of his previous conviction.

Exception 2.– If a witness is asked any question tending to impeach his impartiality and answers it by denying the facts suggested, he may be contradicted.

Illustrations

(a) A claim against an underwriter is resisted on the ground of fraud.

The claimant is asked whether, in a former transaction, he had not made a fraudulent claim. He denies it.

Evidence is offered to show that he did make such a claim.

The evidence is inadmissible

(b) A witness is asked whether he was not dismissed from a situation for dishonesty.

He denies it.

Evidence is offered to show that he was dismissed for dishonesty.

The evidence is not admissible.

(c) A affirms that on a certain day he saw B at Lahore.

A is asked whether he himself was not on that day at Calcutta. He denies it.

Evidence is offered to show that A was on that day at Calcutta.

The evidence is admissible, not as contradicting A on a fact which affects his credit, but as contradicting the alleged fact that B was seen on the day in question in Lahore.

In each of these cases the witness might, if his denial was false, be charged with giving false evidence.

(d) A is asked whether his family has not had a bloodfeud with the family of B against whom he gives evidence.

He denies it. He may be contradicted on the ground that the question tends to impeach his impartiality.

- A word from our sponsors -

Most Popular

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More from Author

Meaning, Nature and Scope of Evidence

Meaning of Evidence Evidence refers to any material or information presented in...

Fundamental Rules of Law of Evidence

The fundamental rules of the Law of Evidence provide the framework...

Admissions under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Definition of Admissions Admissions are statements, whether oral or written, made by...

Confessions under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confessions are an important aspect...

- A word from our sponsors -

Read Now

Meaning, Nature and Scope of Evidence

Meaning of Evidence Evidence refers to any material or information presented in a legal proceeding to establish or challenge relevant facts. It includes facts, statements, documents, objects, or testimonies that help the court in determining the truth and reaching a just decision. Nature of Evidence Relevance: Evidence must have a...

Fundamental Rules of Law of Evidence

The fundamental rules of the Law of Evidence provide the framework for the admissibility, relevancy, and weight of evidence in legal proceedings. These rules help ensure fairness, reliability, and the proper administration of justice. Fundamental Rules Relevance: Evidence must be relevant to the case at hand. It...

Admissions under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Definition of Admissions Admissions are statements, whether oral or written, made by a party to the proceedings or their authorized representative. These statements suggest an inference about any fact in issue or relevant fact and are considered against the interest of the party making them. Types of Admissions Express Admissions:...

Confessions under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confessions are an important aspect of evidence in criminal cases. Definition of Confession A confession is a statement made by an accused person that suggests their guilt in relation to the offence they are charged with. Admissibility of Confessions Confessions made by an accused...

Dying Declaration under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

The concept of a dying declaration is an important aspect of evidence in criminal cases. It refers to the statement made by a person who is on the verge of death, explaining the circumstances surrounding their impending death or the cause of their injuries. Definition A dying declaration...

Evidentiary Value of Admission and Confession

Both admissions and confessions carry significant evidentiary value in legal proceedings. Admissions Admissions are statements made by a party to a legal proceeding or their authorized representative, which are against their interest. Evidentiary Value of Admissions Substantive Evidence: Admissions are considered substantive evidence, meaning they can be used to...

Statements made by Persons who cannot be called as Witnesses

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, there are provisions that allow for the admission of statements made by persons who cannot be called as witnesses. These statements are considered hearsay evidence and are admissible under certain circumstances. Section 32: Statements by Persons who are Dead or Cannot be...

Which Confession is Admissible and Not Admissible under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the admissibility of confessions depends on the circumstances under which they are made. Admissible Confessions Confessions made before a Magistrate (Section 164) Confessions made voluntarily before a Magistrate are generally admissible in court. The Magistrate must ensure that the confession is made without any...

Statements made under Special Circumstances under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, there are certain special circumstances under which statements made by individuals are considered admissible as evidence. These statements are exceptions to the general rule against hearsay evidence. Statements relating to the existence of relationship (Section 32(5)) Statements made by a person who...

Presumptions Regarding Offences under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, there are certain presumptions that arise regarding offences. These presumptions help in determining the burden of proof and shifting the evidentiary burden on the accused. Presumption of innocence (Section 101) Every person accused of an offence is presumed to be innocent until proven...

Expert Opinion under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

The concept of expert opinion plays a significant role in legal proceedings, including under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Expert opinion refers to the testimony or opinion provided by an individual who possesses specialized knowledge, skills, or expertise in a particular field relevant to the case. Definition of...

Oral and Documentary Evidence under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, evidence can be categorized into two main types: Oral Evidence and Documentary Evidence. Oral Evidence Oral evidence refers to the statements made by witnesses during the course of a judicial proceeding. It includes the testimony provided by individuals through their spoken words. Section...