HomeSectionsSection 8: Motive, preparation...

Section 8: Motive, preparation and previous or subsequent conduct

Any fact is relevant which shows or constitutes a motive or preparation for any fact in issue or relevant fact.

The conduct of any party, or of any agent to any party, to any suit or proceeding, in reference to such suit or proceeding, or in reference to any fact in issue therein or relevant thereto, and the conduct of any person an offence against whom is the subject of any proceeding, is relevant, if such conduct influences or is influenced by any fact in issue or relevant fact, and whether it was previous or subsequent thereto.

Explanation 1.– The word “conduct” in this section does not include statements, unless those statements accompany and explain acts other than statements; but this explanation is not to affect the relevancy of statements under any other section of this Act.

Explanation 2.– When the conduct of any person is relevant, any statement made to him or in his presence and hearing, which affects such conduct, is relevant.

Illustrations

(a) A is tried for the murder of B.
The facts that A murdered C, that B knew that A had murdered C, and that B had tried to extort money from A by threatening to make his knowledge public, are relevant.

(b) A sues B upon a bond for the payment of money, B denies the making of the bond. The fact that, at the time when the bond was alleged to be made, B required money for a particular purpose, is relevant.

(c) A is tried for the murder of B by poison.
The fact that, before the death of B, A procured poison similar to that which was administered to B, is relevant.

(d) The question is, whether a certain document is the will of A. The facts that, not long before, the date of the alleged will, A made inquiry into matters to which the provisions of the alleged will relate; that he consulted vakils in reference to making the will, and that he caused drafts of other wills to be prepared, of which he did not approve, are relevant.

(e) A is accused of a crime. The facts that, either before, or at the time of, or after the alleged crime, A provided evidence which would tend to give to the facts of the case an appearance favourable to himself, or that he destroyed or concealed evidence, or prevented the presence or procured the absence of persons who might have been witnesses, or suborned persons to give false evidence respecting it, are relevant.

(f) The question is, whether A robbed B.
The facts that, after B was robbed, C said in A’s presence –– “the police are coming to look for the man who robbed B,” and that immediately afterwards A ran away, are relevant. (g) The question is, whether A owes B rupees 10,000.

The facts that A asked C to lend him money, and that D said to C in A’s presence and hearing– “I advise you not to trust A, for he owes B 10,000 rupees,” and that A went away without making any answer, are relevant facts.

(h) The question is, whether A committed a crime.
The fact that A absconded, after receiving a letter warning him that inquiry was being made for the criminal, and the contents of the letter, are relevant.

(i) A is accused of a crime. The facts that, after the commission of the alleged crime, he absconded, or was in possession of property or the proceeds of property acquired by the crime, or attempted to conceal things which were or might have been used in committing it, are relevant.

(j) The question is, whether A was ravished.
The facts that, shortly after the alleged rape, she made a complaint relating to the crime, the circumstances under which, and the terms in which, the complaint was made, are relevant.

The fact that, without making a complaint, she said that she had been ravished is not relevant as conduct under this section, though it may be relevant as a dying declaration under section 32, clause (1), or as corroborative evidence under section 157.

(k) The question is, whether A was robbed.
The fact that, soon after the alleged robbery, he made a complaint relating to the offence, the circumstances under which, and the terms in which, the complaint was made, are relevant.

The fact that he said he had been robbed, without making any complaint, is not relevant as conduct under this section, though it may be relevant as a dying declaration under section 32, clause (1), or as corroborative evidence under section 157.

- A word from our sponsors -

Most Popular

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More from Author

Meaning, Nature and Scope of Evidence

Meaning of Evidence Evidence refers to any material or information presented in...

Fundamental Rules of Law of Evidence

The fundamental rules of the Law of Evidence provide the framework...

Admissions under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Definition of Admissions Admissions are statements, whether oral or written, made by...

Confessions under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confessions are an important aspect...

- A word from our sponsors -

Read Now

Meaning, Nature and Scope of Evidence

Meaning of Evidence Evidence refers to any material or information presented in a legal proceeding to establish or challenge relevant facts. It includes facts, statements, documents, objects, or testimonies that help the court in determining the truth and reaching a just decision. Nature of Evidence Relevance: Evidence must have a...

Fundamental Rules of Law of Evidence

The fundamental rules of the Law of Evidence provide the framework for the admissibility, relevancy, and weight of evidence in legal proceedings. These rules help ensure fairness, reliability, and the proper administration of justice. Fundamental Rules Relevance: Evidence must be relevant to the case at hand. It...

Admissions under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Definition of Admissions Admissions are statements, whether oral or written, made by a party to the proceedings or their authorized representative. These statements suggest an inference about any fact in issue or relevant fact and are considered against the interest of the party making them. Types of Admissions Express Admissions:...

Confessions under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confessions are an important aspect of evidence in criminal cases. Definition of Confession A confession is a statement made by an accused person that suggests their guilt in relation to the offence they are charged with. Admissibility of Confessions Confessions made by an accused...

Dying Declaration under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

The concept of a dying declaration is an important aspect of evidence in criminal cases. It refers to the statement made by a person who is on the verge of death, explaining the circumstances surrounding their impending death or the cause of their injuries. Definition A dying declaration...

Evidentiary Value of Admission and Confession

Both admissions and confessions carry significant evidentiary value in legal proceedings. Admissions Admissions are statements made by a party to a legal proceeding or their authorized representative, which are against their interest. Evidentiary Value of Admissions Substantive Evidence: Admissions are considered substantive evidence, meaning they can be used to...

Statements made by Persons who cannot be called as Witnesses

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, there are provisions that allow for the admission of statements made by persons who cannot be called as witnesses. These statements are considered hearsay evidence and are admissible under certain circumstances. Section 32: Statements by Persons who are Dead or Cannot be...

Which Confession is Admissible and Not Admissible under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the admissibility of confessions depends on the circumstances under which they are made. Admissible Confessions Confessions made before a Magistrate (Section 164) Confessions made voluntarily before a Magistrate are generally admissible in court. The Magistrate must ensure that the confession is made without any...

Statements made under Special Circumstances under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, there are certain special circumstances under which statements made by individuals are considered admissible as evidence. These statements are exceptions to the general rule against hearsay evidence. Statements relating to the existence of relationship (Section 32(5)) Statements made by a person who...

Presumptions Regarding Offences under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, there are certain presumptions that arise regarding offences. These presumptions help in determining the burden of proof and shifting the evidentiary burden on the accused. Presumption of innocence (Section 101) Every person accused of an offence is presumed to be innocent until proven...

Expert Opinion under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

The concept of expert opinion plays a significant role in legal proceedings, including under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Expert opinion refers to the testimony or opinion provided by an individual who possesses specialized knowledge, skills, or expertise in a particular field relevant to the case. Definition of...

Oral and Documentary Evidence under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, evidence can be categorized into two main types: Oral Evidence and Documentary Evidence. Oral Evidence Oral evidence refers to the statements made by witnesses during the course of a judicial proceeding. It includes the testimony provided by individuals through their spoken words. Section...